Talk:Neknampur Lake

India: Hyderabad Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Hyderabad (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Lakes Low‑importance

	Lakes portal Neknampur Lake is within the scope of WikiProject Lakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lake-related articles on Wikipedia, using the tools on the project page. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LakesWikipedia:WikiProject LakesTemplate:WikiProject LakesLakes articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Water Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Water, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Water supply-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WaterWikipedia:WikiProject WaterTemplate:WikiProject WaterWater articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Environment Low‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ecology Low‑importance

	Ecology portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Ecology, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve ecology-related articles.EcologyWikipedia:WikiProject EcologyTemplate:WikiProject EcologyEcology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in Telangana may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in Hyderabad may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Did you know nomination

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that Neknampur Lake restoration "has been recognised as a role model in the 'watershed development' category along with four other projects" in India?

Source: * ^[1] ^[2] ^[3] ^[4]

ALT1: ... that the restoration of Neknampur Lake was recognised "as the best model of lake restoration in India"? Source: * ^[5] ^[6] ^[7]
Reviewed:

Created by Sarvagyana guru (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 5 past nominations.

Sarvagyana guru (talk) 06:05, 7 October 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Article seems good enough for DYK (all content referenced, hook is neutral enough - citing attributed praise), copyvio spotcheck at 20% seems good (green), long enough, new enough. QPQ is needed, please ping me when it is done. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:11, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Piotrus:

I think I had reviewed three nominations (as per best of my understanding). These are

Note to Sarvagyana guru and Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus: the QPQ reviews provided do not appear to be complete DYK reviews, covering all the basic DYK criteria such as newness, length, neutrality, free of copyvio, hook cited and interesting, and so on. In particular, Sankar Montoute and It's OK I'm OK only discuss the hook, and Hugh O'Neill, Earl of Tyrone only mentions length and "well-sourced" in its approval, which is not adequate. I have also adjusted both hooks to change the italics into quote marks; I also discovered that the article failed to properly identify the actual quotes for those hooks, which is technically a copyvio, so I have adjusted it accordingly. This meant adjusting the quotes to cover more material. (In once case, two apostrophes together were used in the article rather than the double-quote character, causing italics there rather than visible " marks at the beginning and end of the quote.) Piotrus, I think a more careful review of the quoted material is in order, given what I just found. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:44, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@BlueMoonset: I see, thank you. I confirmed before and double checked now that the quoted terms for the hook(s), i.e. 'watershed development' and 'best model' appear in sourced cited, so the article seems fine, once the QPQ reviews are done (well, a single one will suffice to pass this, but it would be good to fix the others, which @Sarvagyana guru: can then use as fuel for two more DYKs :) PS. Sarvagyana guru, please WP:PING me when you reply here to me, otherwise I may not see your message. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:10, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Piotrus: As per the feedback received, review of DYK for Sankar Montoute done. Review of It's OK I'm OK and Hugh O'Neill, Earl of Tyrone will also be attempted as per given suggestions. Sarvagyana guru (talk) 06:03, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@BlueMoonset: I think the QPQ for the Sankar Montoute is ok now? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:22, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Piotrus, the new review seems to cover what's needed, though I haven't checked the details. (Minor quibble: if sources are being accepted AGF because they can't be checked online, then the tick should be the gray {{DYKtickAGF}} rather than the regular green ({{DYKtick}}, but it's a common error made by reviewers of all experience levels.) BlueMoonset (talk) 16:31, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per above - GTG. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:05, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

[1] "Neknampur Lake Restoration Gets NITI Aayog Recognition".

[2] "Rejuvenated Neknampur lake wins Niti Aayog laurels".

[3] "Neknampur lake gets Niti Aayog's recognition".

[4] "Once a dumpyard, this Hyderabad lake is now a hub for eco-friendly events".

[5] "Neknampur lake: Private entity's sustainable restoration earns recognition from CSE".

[6] "Neknampur lake garners accolades for restoration".

[7] "Restoration of Neknampur Lake receives praise".

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]