Talk:Neoconservative postmodernism
Appearance
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
Eh?
[edit]Err... I wonder if some enlightened person could edit this article and actually say in plain English what the term means? M.J.E. (talk) 10:55, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
- That help any? Hyacinth (talk) 22:16, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
Pointless
[edit]what a pointless and idiotic article
a postmodernist that claims they are a humanist is a "neoconservative postmodernist"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vive1936 (talk • contribs) 03:45, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
- It is generally considered rude and inappropriate to call people and things "idiotic". See Wikipedia:No personal attacks. More pertinently, "the talk page is for discussing how to improve the article." (WP:TALK) Your comment does not provide others with assistance in improving the article or indicate how one could do so. Hyacinth (talk) 05:10, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
- i somewhat doubt reich would respond well to being called a neo-conservative. the language is extremely loaded, and the article should probably be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.53.24.135 (talk) 01:44, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
- A matter to be resolved in the courts, when and if Reich demands the deletion of John Brackett's 2008 book (it is not an article).—Jerome Kohl (talk) 04:42, 10 March 2013 (UTC)