Talk:Nereus (underwater vehicle)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Standards[edit]

I don´t know what Wikipedia policy is (and I am not going to second-guess the gatekeepers who hold sway over this Internet site) but the Imperial units used in this article are the ones which should be in parentheses -- not the Metric ones (and anyone who would dispute this would be guilty of, uh, parochialism).

Pazouzou (talk) 06:22, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to dispute this even though I'm not guilty of parochialism. Agreed that metric units are preferred. The problem is that the original source for this information gives numbers in non-standard units. So the article is quoting the original figure, while also converting it to standard units so the reader will know what the actual depth is. Rees11 (talk) 13:23, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a submarine?[edit]

If this thing is a submarine it would be useful to know that. If not, it would be interesting to know why not. Rees11 (talk) 13:24, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

this is confusing[edit]

"The optic fiber tether has the approximate diameter of a human hair, and can bear only 4 kilograms (8.8 pounds)." What does it mean that it can 'bear 4 kg'? A sow pig can bear 8-16 piglets in a litter, but I don't think that is what is meant here. This needs to be reworded to say more clearly whatever it's supposed to mean. T-bonham (talk) 19:41, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deepest diving vehicle?[edit]

So, is it the deepest diving vehicle? Or the second deepest? This article currently claims both. Kunstcleaver (talk) 02:18, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Nereus (underwater vehicle). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:04, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]