Talk:Nesomys narindaensis/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Xtzou (Talk) 20:53, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I am reviewing this article. It is very technical (to say the least) but it does seem like there is an effort to make the information accessible. This article is the best it can be, given the limited material.
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality: Clearly and concisely written.
- B. MoS compliance: Complies with required elements of MOS
- A. Prose quality: Clearly and concisely written.
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources: Reliable sources
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: Well referenced
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources: Reliable sources
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects: Sets the context
- B. Focused: Remains focused on the topic
- A. Major aspects: Sets the context
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail: Pass!
- Pass or Fail: Pass!
Congratulations! Xtzou (Talk) 20:53, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks! Yes, it's quite technical with only teeth to describe. We do actually have a skull for this one, but for some reason the describers chose not to say anything about that skull except a few measurements. A pity, because a description of the skull would at least have been a little less technical than one of the molars only. Ucucha 21:00, 1 June 2010 (UTC)