Jump to content

Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming/Workshop

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Current structure of article[edit]

  1. INTRODUCTION
    Definition, summary, focus, uses, criticisms
  2. OVERVIEW
    • Philosophical stance
    evidence rather than theory base, "what is true/real", subjective perception, client oriented goals, "what works", wide open to development at whim
    • Self-declared scope
    what is legitimately considered "fair game" by NLP - anything subjective. list...
    • Descriptions by its major developers and promoters
    bandler, andreas etc's descriptions
    • Theory
    dilts, bandler etc views on whether nlp has a theory, or is driven by one
    • Meaning of "neuro-linguistic programming"
    senses, neural processing, brain lateralization (tangential?)
  3. FUNDAMENTALS
    • Foundational assumptions/presuppositional beliefs
    map/territory, systemic process, positive intention, rapport, failure/feedback, choice/flexibility, meaning of your communication, people have resources, multiple descriptions, long list of other working principles and practices
    • Conscious and unconscious process
    focus on "what works", conscious understanding not always relevant (relates to principles)
    • Meta model and Milton model
    brief description, "based upon", chomsky, usage
    • Modeling
    brief description, heart of nlp, purpose, scope of application (prosaic to esoteric)
    • Anchoring
    Types, Uses, Etc
    • Representational systems
    VAK, eye cues, language words, body types
    • Other Concepts, Models and Techniques
    multiple positions, logical levels, V/K dissociation, submodalities, B.A.G.E.L.
  4. BACKGROUND (history of NLP)
    big section, probably needs own article and summary
  5. APPLICATIONS (target markets, usages)
    niche, commercial, charismatic
    • Ethics in NLP
    Ecology, advocacy of win-win, unethical use
  6. CRITICISM
    • Scientific analysis
    • New Age
    energy, spirituality, esp etc
    • Multiple branding/commercialization
    • Ethical concerns
    • Questionable applications/claims
    • Cult usage and characteristics


In addition previous versions have included sections which could be merged back in:

  • Research into NLP
  • Applications - use of NLP in health, law enforcement, govt, education/coaching
  • Is NLP a science
  • NLP and (psycho)therapy/psychology
  • Aspects of NLP - practicality, experimentation, observation and feedback, client centered, structure, clarity of thought
  • History - intellectual antecedants


And should probably include also:

  • NLP professional structure - qualifications, regulation (or lack of), qualifications needed to train, continuing ethics, integration with psychotherapeutic bodies etc (or not)
  • Outdated models - brain lateralization, sole rep system, etc.
  • Controversies - including professional views, etc

Edit at will!!

Comments and discussion of above structure[edit]

Outdated Models... Definitely a good section to add. Perhaps with some sourced quotes on the nature of how things progress in NLP.Doc Pato 21:59, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And how they become outdated too. It's pretty much inherent in the choice of practice over theory. Want to edit it into the above? Its easier for collaborative editing, than editing the entire article. FT2 (Talk) 22:07, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]