Jump to content

Talk:Nevado del Huila

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Elevation

[edit]

According to the CNN article the volcano is over 18,000 feet/5600 meters high. What is correct? --—Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.167.26.18 (talkcontribs)

Older refs often gave elevations as high as 5,750 m (18,860 ft), but those are not correct. The most commonly accepted elevation in current refs is 5,365 m (17,602 ft), which is given in the infobox in the article. The latest measurements by the SRTM in 2000 indicate a maximum elevation of 5,375 m (17,635 ft). So CNN is wrong, they should quote elevations from more reliable sources. --Seattle Skier (See talk tierS) 05:05, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Updated to 5364 m, which is what the Colombian geophysical agency and observatory, INGEOMINAS, uses. A goofy number had been put in some time in the past to replace what was in the infobox. Elevations for South American volcanoes on WP tend to get vandalized (really no other way to put it) for silly nationalistic reasons, but if the Colombian geoscientists themselves use that elevation, it's good enough for me. -- Bill-on-the-Hill (talk) 20:16, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Bill-on-the-Hill. The elevation was changed to the archaic and inflated 5750m on 25 November 2009 and immediately reverted by me. It was inflated again on 24 February by User:Mateo.gable but this time I was not watching. SRTM data suggests it's actually nearer 5390m but it's definitely not 5750m or even 5600m. Employees of august outfits like CNN and NASA often copy elevations from old and outdated sources. Viewfinder (talk) 23:32, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nevado del Ruiz similarities?

[edit]

These eruptions seem pretty similar. I'm currently working on that article to FA status, help from anyone who contributed substantially to this article would be nice! —Ceran (talk) 16:58, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Nevado del Huila. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:51, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Nevado del Huila. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:14, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]