Talk:New Fairfield Historical District

This article was nominated for speedy deletion on the ground that it was a short article and did not provide sufficient context for the information provided. After reviewing the nomination, I have decided not to speedy-delete because the article was just created today and the author, who is a good-faith contributor, may intend to add more information. If this does not occur after a few days, the article may be retagged. Newyorkbrad 23:51, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Nikkimaria: I disagree with your deletion of 90 percent of this article with no reason except "too much information". You appear to be starting an editing war here, which I would like to avoid. You might consider splitting the article and putting the information you don't like in a separate article which would simply be referenced in this one. Does that sound reasonable? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Postazoic (talk • contribs) 21:55, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Much of the content you propose is sourced to either primary sources or user-created genealogies, and does not seem appropriate for an article on any notable topic AFAICS. What would you propose splitting it to? Nikkimaria (talk) 23:48, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Nikkimaria: On reviewing the deleted material, I think you are right. It seems to be more suitable for some genealogical record than this article. And the information is accessible in the article's history if someone wants to preserve it elsewhere. So it looks like we agree. Postazoic (talk) 07:54, 16 March 2023 (UTC)