Talk:New Generation Rollingstock
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Gallery
[edit]Image use policy, paragraph 3 states:
Wikipedia is not an image repository. A gallery is not a tool to shoehorn images into an article, and a gallery consisting of an indiscriminate collection of images of the article subject should generally either be improved in accordance with the above paragraph or moved to Wikimedia Commons.
The gallery in this article breaches this policy, a link to the commons gallery has been provided. Primetime44 (talk) 03:17, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
- Seems that images are being rammed in again. Name of the game isn't to shoehorn in as many as possible per the policy above. Three images of the same train on the same day is an overkill.
- To try and resolve the ongoing 'my image is better' dispute in the infobox section, as a neutral observer, the image in this version [1] is superior to the one in [2]. The latter is compromised by a shadow and having people in the foreground. Another alternative may to be to use another image uploaded by someone other than the two combatants? Primetime44 (talk) 05:53, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Acceleration (& deceleration) rate of NGR.
[edit]Anyone have that info? 14.203.212.68 (talk) 15:24, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class rail transport articles
- Low-importance rail transport articles
- All WikiProject Trains pages
- Start-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- Start-Class Queensland articles
- Low-importance Queensland articles
- WikiProject Queensland articles
- Start-Class Australian Transport articles
- Low-importance Australian Transport articles
- WikiProject Australian Transport articles
- WikiProject Australia articles