Talk:New Jersey Route 167/GA2
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 22:58, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Infobox
[edit]- No issues
Lead
[edit]- No issues
Route description
[edit]- No issues
History
[edit]- No issues
Major intersections
[edit]- No issues
References
[edit]- Reference 12 → Link does not work according to this
After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to put it on hold at this time. I will give you the general seven days to fix the issue with the dead link, as listed above. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Rp0211 (talk2me) 23:10, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
- Done. Mitch32(There is a destiny that makes us... family.) 02:20, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
- All issues have been addressed, so I feel comfortable passing this article. Congratulations and keep up the good work! Rp0211 (talk2me) 22:27, 28 June 2012 (UTC)