Jump to content

Talk:New Jersey Route 182

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleNew Jersey Route 182 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 13, 2009Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:New Jersey Route 182/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

This article is a clear pass to GA. Some suggestions I'd make is to remove the Notes column in the table if there aren't any notes. Plus, it would be nice to have a map for this road, but that won't hold it back from GA status. Cheers! --Eustress (talk) 01:55, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

USRD GA audit

[edit]

This article has failed the USRD GA audit and will be sent to WP:GAR if the issues are not resolved within one week. Please see WT:USRD for more details, and please ask me if you have any questions as to why this article failed. --Rschen7754 (T C) 03:57, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on New Jersey Route 182. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:54, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]