Talk:New Jersey Route 36

New Jersey Route 36 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 19, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed

U.S. Roads: State highways / New Jersey Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics	U.S. state highways
Locations	New Jersey
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

New Jersey Mid‑importance

	New Jersey portal This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments

Would NJ Route 18 be considered major at NJ 36?

Nextbarker 04:34, 8 November 2006 (UTC)nextbarker[reply]

Yes, although it was probably originally left off due to its proximity to the parkway. Please keep in mind that there is a new standard for the links (NJ XX instead of Route XX), and that "NJ" after the town name is unnecessary on intra-state routes. -- NORTH ^talk 04:55, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

County Route 547 won't be major right, because there are no big ramps?

Nextbarker 05:59, 8 November 2006 (UTC)nextbarker[reply]

Why ask saying that it's not major, and then add it anyway? CR 547 is not major because it's useless to have 3 Eatontown junctions in the list. -- NORTH ^talk 00:01, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I won't add anymore shields unless I get an approval

Nextbarker 06:32, 9 November 2006 (UTC)nextbarker[reply]

I didn't mean that you can't add them. You can do what ever you want, as long as you allow other people to edit as well. I was just confused because you said "547 won't be major, right?", but then you added it anyway. -- NORTH ^talk 17:15, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Route 36 @ CR Route 516

Would CR Route 516 be considered major at Route 36 in Hazlet?

Nextbarker 05:59, 12 November 2006 (UTC)nextbarker[reply]

No, because it's so close to the terminus in Keyport, and because the other junction with CR 516 in Middletown is already listed. -- NORTH ^talk 04:39, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NJ Route 36 direction

What direction does Route 36 go in N/S or E/W?

--24.228.70.72 02:30, 4 October 2007 (UTC)nextbarker[reply]

Merging County Route 9 (Monmouth County, New Jersey)

The article County Route 9 (Monmouth County, New Jersey) should be merged into the history section of this article because it is short and basically describes the history of a part of New Jersey Route 36. Dough4872 (talk) 02:36, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merging County Route 44 (Monmouth County, New Jersey)

The article County Route 44 (Monmouth County, New Jersey) should be merged into the history section of this article because it is short and basically describes the history of a part of New Jersey Route 36. Dough4872 (talk) 18:51, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have merged both articles into New Jersey Route 36 as part of the improvements to get the New Jersey Route 36 article to GA status. Dough4872 (talk) 18:34, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

USRD GA audit

This article has failed the USRD GA audit and will be sent to WP:GAR if the issues are not resolved within one week. Please see WT:USRD for more details, and please ask me if you have any questions as to why this article failed. --Rschen7754 (T C) 04:12, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Dough4872 (talk) 21:57, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on New Jersey Route 36. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150610201430/http://m.app.com/BETTER/news.jsp?key=85496&p=1 to http://m.app.com/BETTER/news.jsp?key=85496&p=1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:41, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on New Jersey Route 36. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:09, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on New Jersey Route 36. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:00, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]