Talk:New Jersey Route 92/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 20:12, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Infobox
[edit]- No issues
Lead
[edit]- No issues
History
[edit]- No issues
Proposed alignments
[edit]- Fix disambiguation issue with "East Windsor" according to this
Proposed interchanges
[edit]- Source needed to verify information in "Route 92 (Princeton-Hightstown)" subsection
References
[edit]- No issues
After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to put it on hold at this time. I will give you the general seven days to fix these mistakes and/or address other issues which you believe do not affect good article status. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Rp0211 (talk2me) 20:23, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
- That shouldn't have been there period, someone added it. Fixed the other problems. Mitch32(There is a destiny that makes us... family.) 20:49, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
- All issues have been addressed, so I feel confident passing this article. Congratulations and keep up the good work! Rp0211 (talk2me) 21:08, 27 June 2012 (UTC)