Talk:New Pride Flag

This redirect is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles

Heraldry and vexillology

New Pride Flag is within the scope of the Heraldry and vexillology WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of heraldry and vexillology. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Heraldry and vexillologyWikipedia:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillologyTemplate:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillologyheraldry and vexillology articles

not relevant[edit]

This flag doesn't actually have relevance, yet it's the first Google result when people search for new pride flag looking for the one with the czech-flag-like design. A random flag some internet activist made that was flown by like 2 different organizations doesn't have relevance. 2003:CB:1F0F:3101:6108:E962:653A:BA7E (talk) 20:55, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not global[edit]

I think this flag is of relevance only in countries where black and brown people may face racial discrimination (e.g., white-majority countries like USA, Canada, European countries, Australia, New Zealand, etc.). This flag is not of relevance where black or brown people are in majority, and hence do not face racial discrimination (e.g., African countries having majority black population, south Asian countries with majority brown population, etc.). 50.30.178.10 (talk) 12:34, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

relevant?[edit]

This flag is much less widespread than the Progress Flag, which doesnt have its own article. Condense and merge, or make one standalone article for all derivates of the original Pride Flag. --jonas (talk) 15:49, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merge complete (June 2022)[edit]

I completed the merge per consensus from multiple people above and notability compared with the Progress Flag. I read through the article and references and tried to preserve as much content as possible, though there were some things that seemed like editorializing and/or primary source content which I did not move over. Caleb Stanford (talk) 03:52, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]