Jump to content

Talk:New York State Route 348

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleNew York State Route 348 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 18, 2008Good article nomineeListed

GA review

[edit]
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    Since you have an exact date of decommissioning, might as well use it in the lead. "Slosson Road came next," -- odd grammatical fragment, reword. Needed a non-breaking space but I put it in. "1980–present" needs an en-dash.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    It would be good to note that Adirondack Northway is I-87 in the lead, and link to it. Did the road pass anything of historical notability, or did it serve an important purpose upon establishment?
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Interesting question here - What would be the usual way of handling a decommissioned route (I know I reviewed one before and didn't bring it up there, but oh well) -- describing it in the past tense, or referring to it as the new route and describing it as the new route in the present tense? —Rob (talk) 21:13, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've always used the past tense since it's a designation that no longer exists. – TMF 21:24, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That would be correct. Also, everything is complete. As for your question, 348 was in the North Country, and did not pass much of anything of interest.Mitch32contribs 21:27, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. That paragraph still looked awkward, so I rewrote it. Looks good now, though. Thanks! —Rob (talk) 22:01, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on New York State Route 348. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:57, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:New_York_State_Route_348&oldid=1203287876"