Talk:New York State Route 359/GA1

GA Review

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   Your WP:LEAD introduces new, unreferenced information: One of the shortest signed routes. Also: "It is the only instance in New York of a route designated without an alphabetic suffix that terminates at both ends at suffixed routes" is new / unreferenced.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Awaiting improvements. On hold. --Admrboltz (talk) 06:40, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Most removed, otherwise - it should be done...Mitch32^(UP) 19:25, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Actually, now that we know that information exists, the article is not broad in coverage since you've removed it. –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 21:09, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Readded, but not in lead and with refs.Mitch32^(UP) 18:22, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Passing --Admrboltz (talk) 19:23, 20 September 2008 (UTC)