Talk:New minor forcing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Contract bridge, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Contract bridge on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Contract bridgeWikipedia:WikiProject Contract bridgeTemplate:WikiProject Contract bridgeContract bridge articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fourteen cards[edit]

This example hand: ♠Txxx ♥AJ ♦KTxx ♣KQxx) on which one might not show ones Spades after recieving a 1H response, has fourteen cards. Will in New Haven

Fixed Matchups 18:22, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rebid question[edit]

Consider this other example hand:

♠ Axxx ♥ KQxx ♦ Jxx ♣ Ax : planning to force to game, in either spades or notrump, (or, remotely possibly, diamonds)

It seems clear to me to rebid 3NT, not 2♣ here. Suppose partner has the other example hand which would have bypassed 1♠ (♠ Txxx ♥ AJ ♦ KTxx ♣ KQx. Do you really want to be in 4♠? And as noted, if partner has ♠ Kxx ♥ AJx ♦ KQTxx ♣ xx, 5♦ is nearly cold, while 3NT is hopeless on a club lead, but can you get there (or to 4♥)? Matchups 18:22, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article title[edit]

Should the article title not be New Minor Forcing, i.e. caps on all of the words? Newwhist (talk) 12:25, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]