Talk:Newark Liberty International Airport/GA2
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: MyCatIsAChonk (talk · contribs) 23:01, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
I'll start my review now! MyCatIsAChonk (talk) 23:01, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- @MyCatIsAChonk Sounds great. Jibreel23 (talk) 00:47, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- @MyCatIsAChonkI did all the suggestions you made except "Inevitably, the airport was close for months" as I could not find a source saying how many. Jibreel23 (talk) 00:48, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- @MyCatIsAChonk I noticed you did not cross out the TWA suggestions so I went ahead and corrected that again. I changed "when the airport" to "with the airport". Jibreel23 (talk) 02:08, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Jibreel23 Thanks for changing it so quickly! I'm still reviewing, and I'll notify you when I'm finished. Thanks! MyCatIsAChonk (talk) 14:12, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- @MyCatIsAChonk I believe I corrected all the mistakes you put. If there is anything new or I missed anything, or just possibly made another error please let me know. Jibreel23 (talk) 22:46, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Jibreel23 Wow, you're a fast editor; thank you for the fixes! I'm still reviewing (this article is a bit long!) but I hope to be done in the coming days. MyCatIsAChonk (talk) 01:52, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- @MyCatIsAChonk I believe I corrected all the new suggestions. Also thanks for cleaning up the citations in the bus and train areas. Jibreel23 (talk) 00:47, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Jibreel23 Getting real close to being done here! I've gone through everything except "Accidents and disasters". See my notes below for why; once everything is all set, it's good to go. MyCatIsAChonk (talk) 02:26, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- @MyCatIsAChonk I was able to a find a FedEx route map, but besides that I could not find anything else especially not recently. Other than that I am glad we are almost done I started work on this in February of last year! 300 edits later it could finally be a GA. Jibreel23 (talk) 03:01, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- @MyCatIsAChonk I just chopped down the accidents and disasters section to comply with the WP:AIRPORT-CONTENT. Jibreel23 (talk) 03:05, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Jibreel23 The coveted check has been given; congratulations! You've implemented all my suggestions quickly, and I appreciate the timeliness. My suggestions for next steps would be to archive a lot of the citations to prevent link rot, and also to keep a close eye on any news about the opening of Terminal A and expansion of the PATH network. Are you planning on nominating this for Did you know? MyCatIsAChonk (talk) 03:29, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- @MyCatIsAChonk Than you so much I really appreciate it. I will continue to maintain, and expand the article with the suggestions you made. I might nominate this for DYK in the future. But thank you so very much for being easy-going, and doing a good review I have spent a year on this, and now its a GA! My first GA! Jibreel23 (talk) 13:08, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Jibreel23 The coveted check has been given; congratulations! You've implemented all my suggestions quickly, and I appreciate the timeliness. My suggestions for next steps would be to archive a lot of the citations to prevent link rot, and also to keep a close eye on any news about the opening of Terminal A and expansion of the PATH network. Are you planning on nominating this for Did you know? MyCatIsAChonk (talk) 03:29, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Jibreel23 Getting real close to being done here! I've gone through everything except "Accidents and disasters". See my notes below for why; once everything is all set, it's good to go. MyCatIsAChonk (talk) 02:26, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- @MyCatIsAChonk I believe I corrected all the new suggestions. Also thanks for cleaning up the citations in the bus and train areas. Jibreel23 (talk) 00:47, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Jibreel23 Wow, you're a fast editor; thank you for the fixes! I'm still reviewing (this article is a bit long!) but I hope to be done in the coming days. MyCatIsAChonk (talk) 01:52, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- @MyCatIsAChonk I believe I corrected all the mistakes you put. If there is anything new or I missed anything, or just possibly made another error please let me know. Jibreel23 (talk) 22:46, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Jibreel23 Thanks for changing it so quickly! I'm still reviewing, and I'll notify you when I'm finished. Thanks! MyCatIsAChonk (talk) 14:12, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- @MyCatIsAChonk I noticed you did not cross out the TWA suggestions so I went ahead and corrected that again. I changed "when the airport" to "with the airport". Jibreel23 (talk) 02:08, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
Everything looks good now. | |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. |
Everything has been fixed. | |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. |
All good now. | |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | Citations are all good; quotations are properly cited and there are no bare URLs. | |
2c. it contains no original research. | No original research visible; statements/claims are cited. | |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | Earwig shows no copyvios or plagiarism.
| |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | Article follows the inclusion standards in WikiProject Aviation. | |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). |
All good now, content is focused. | |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | No visible bias within the article. | |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | No edit wars or disputes. | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | Media is correctly tagged; fair use image at the top (the airport's logo) has correct non-free use rationale. | |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | Images are relevant and captioned appropriatly; some were a bit small, but I slightly increased them to make them more visible. | |
7. Overall assessment. | After many changes, it's finally all set. See the discussion above for my final thoughts. Thanks! |