Talk:Newport, Kentucky

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Kentucky portal This article is supported by WikiProject Kentucky (assessed as Mid-importance).

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

List of restaurants

Is a list of restaurants (most of which are really not important, IMO) really needed as part of this encyclopedia article? Vbofficial 15:40, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. It seems like it belongs more on wikitravel than anything else. This article needs a "History" section, not a list of restaurants. J.H (talk) 18:49, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Picture

The picture if of sky rise apartments which are located in Bellevue, not in Newport. Doesn't anyone have a picture of Newport?

I agree with the ip dude. The picture is shown from cincinnati, pointing towards the bellevue part of the cities. It should probably not be shown on this article, maybe shown on the Bellevue article? WWEISREAL 22:12, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree too. Actually, that building is in Newport, as is the bridge, but at the very edge of the city's boundaries. Everything in the background is Bellevue though. J.H (talk) 18:51, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

County Seat

The history of the county seat is convoluted, but Alexandria has been the only County Seat since 1840. I will provide documentation to show this in the next few days. Kentucky doesn't have anything online. I will scan in the documents. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.130.97.248 (talk) 23:55, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Me again. I have a slew of paperwork now. About 900 pages worth of documentation. Someday, I'll get it all to a Kinko's and scan it all in. In the mean time, looking at the judge's ruling, page 2 - 3, it explains explicitly that "In 1840, pursuant to an act of the Kentucky Legislature, the county seat, then located at Newport, was established at Alexandria. No evidence has been presented to this court that this formal designation of Alexandria as the county seat of Campbell County has ever changed. Evidence provided by the Defendants that Newport is considered a county seat or one of two county seats by historians, encyclopedias (editor's note: Wikipedia was cited in this case) and government agencies is based upon practical realities of how county government and the court system have functioned, pursuant to law, in Campbell County for the past 150 years. However, none of the special acts related to the Newport Court House District ever designated Newport as the county seat." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.241.255.130 (talk) 01:21, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Newport, Kentucky. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150205091017/http://www.kentucky.com/471/story/117121.html to http://www.kentucky.com/471/story/117121.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:02, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline

What is missing from the recently created city timeline article? Please add relevant content! Contributions welcome. Thank you. -- M2545 (talk) 13:03, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

https://ir.library.louisville.edu/etd/1574/

Is the Frank Peluso who we have now as vice mayor related to the Peluso (referenced in thesis) who was in the Newport city commissioners office in the late 80's?

George Rattermann didn't eliminate all the brothels, they shut down the final ones on monmouth street in '05-'06.

The mainstream media always seem to not know what they're talking about. This author clearly does.....

Feel free to edit the timeline or perhaps even write a more lengthy section or whole page on the corruption history specifically, I think someone should but I'm not a good choice for it. Maybe forward this to someone else if you can't.

Thanks. Wvusidtn27 (talk) 16:16, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline of Newport, Kentucky

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Newport, Kentucky. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:34, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Content dispute over photo

User:LoomCreek is insistent that this aerial photo from 1923, be included in the article. Images must be "significant and relevant", and "an important illustrative aid to understanding", per MOS:IMAGERELEVANCE. Are readers going to say, "gee, that's what Newport, Kentucky, looked like from an airplane in 1923!" Seriously, no one looks at a city this way. The image is low-quality and decorative, and should be removed. If readers want to see the city from 5000 feet, there's a link to a Google Map in the infobox. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:57, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'd appreciate it if you would talk to me directly instead of in the third person. LoomCreek (talk) 17:01, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@LoomCreek: I'm seeking the input of other editors as well regarding the relevance of this image. You are welcome to respond. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:26, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, personally I do think it's useful for a few reasons. It shows the previous density of the city at the time before streets were widened and most notably shows the giant steel mill at the bottom of the photo by the river. If you look closely you can also see some of the rail tracks on some of the roads that made up the town/city's streetcar network at the time (such as the green line). - LoomCreek (talk) 18:41, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think a wiki article is the place for dark, grainy, "if you look closely" pics that would likely make most people squint and find it difficult to derive informative value. I'd say, if someone wants to convey how a city looked at a particular time, they would need an encyclopedic-grade photo for that purpose, and this isn't it. It frankly looks spooky. Continue the search. Nobody should want their city presented in this low-quality manner. Think like your tourist office and proceed from there. That all said, linking to an image like this, as long as no better one can be found, might have some use in discussion of the earlier layout of the city. Stefen Tower_{s among the rest!} ^{Gab • Gruntwerk} 02:58, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]