Talk:Niagara (grape)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and carefull attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 19:39, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Foxy" POV[edit]

"Enough with this nonsense about "foxiness". It's clear from viewing the history of this and other pages that one Wikipedia editor has decided to apply the obtusely vague adjective "foxy" to any Indigenous North American Grape cultivar. Use of the term "foxy" in this sense is either a neologism or completely unestablished as it cannot be found in any dictionary. In any case it does nothing to further the public's knowledge and comprehension of the flavour of this grape cultivar. 67.142.172.31 (talk) 04:50, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Foxy" is a term used in the wine literature, it's not made up by an editor. Tomas e (talk) 17:30, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Should a random quote by a wine snob really be in the wiki?[edit]

"One reviewer, Paul Bulas, attempted to characterize the "foxy" description. In analyzing the Niagara grape, he detected aromas like candied lemon rind, a Riesling-like diesel aroma, flowery jasmine-like notes, and what he called "a high-toned, candied muskiness." This latter descriptor he felt was the primary element of the term "foxy". "


seriously? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.31.172.189 (talk) 21:33, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]