Talk:Nick Scott (rugby union)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 26 January 2022[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 (talk) 07:38, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


– no clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC per page views [1] Joeykai (talk) 05:31, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support per nomination. There are four men listed upon the Nick Scott (disambiguation) page and the two-sentence stub for the rugby union player is most certainly not the primary topic. —Roman Spinner (talkcontribs) 07:54, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. No primary topic. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:59, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 16:50, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Happy with this move. There were no other Nick Scott's when I created the page, and now there are he certainly isn't the primary topic. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 18:44, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nominator. No clear primary topic for this title, and if there was, it wouldn't be the rugby player. The safest bet is to have the disambiguation page at the basename. Paintspot Infez (talk) 18:05, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong support the American footballer has 7,760 views and the bodybuilder has 102 compared with only 117 for the rugby player, if anything the footballer is primary. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:15, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.