Talk:Nicotinic antagonist

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Do we need to mention varenicline here? JFW | T@lk 10:22, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd support its inclusion. --Arcadian 19:15, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I wouldn't. Varenicline is a nicotinic partial agonist, not an antagonist. Thinking of buproprion? That should be here.98.204.241.151 (talk) 17:31, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rocuronium[edit]

Should we include rocuronium? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.57.34.53 (talk) 03:20, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, yes, all of the "oniums" apply.98.204.241.151 (talk) 17:31, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Succinylcholine[edit]

Why is this listed here? Isn't succinylcholine an nictonic agonist? A depolarizing agent can't be an antagonist; the depolarization happens as a result of the agonist binding.98.204.241.151 (talk) 17:24, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Buprorion[edit]

We should include buproprion.98.204.241.151 (talk) 17:31, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]