Talk:Night of the Dead Living/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GRAPPLE X 00:57, 17 March 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]


Bear in mind this is my first GA review, so I hope this goes right. I've never seen Homicide before so I figure I should be nice and neutral about it. Here goes.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    Prose style is clear and informative; tone is suitable for encyclopaedic content.
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
    I see no MOS violations/deviations.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    Inline citations are present and used well.
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    Would like to see citations other than from book sources that can't be readily checked - do web pages exist to support this article as well? Not a major point but would be useful to have.
    C. No original research:
    Pretty simple, there's no OR present.
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    Covers the subject in sufficient depth as to provide a good level information.
    B. Focused:
    Does not deviate from the subject or wander into other territory.
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
    Neutral and unbiased. The article does not rely on opinion or rhetoric.
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
    Article has no revision disputes, nor is it changing rapidly or drastically.
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    Lead (and only) image checks out.
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    Would perhaps like to see a second image used further down the page, perhaps of production or the main cast. Not vital at all though.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    Overall, I think this article is a nice little example of how television episodes should be covered here. It's informative and does a good job of being such. In light of this, I'm going to pass this article as a Good Article.