Talk:Nightfreak and the Sons of Becker/GA1
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Wetrorave (talk · contribs) 15:09, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Following my reviews of 1977 (Ash album) and Avalanche United, it's likely fine for me to review this. Wetrorave (talk) 15:09, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Infobox and lead[edit]
- Infobox looks good, image has a proper rationale
- "the Coral released" > "the Coral, released"
- "writing Nightfreak and the Sons of Becker" > "writing the record"
- "for the Lightning Seeds. The Coral" > "for the Lightning Seeds; the Coral"
Background and recording[edit]
- "were subsequently certified" > "were certified" because 'subsequently' is redundant
- "A few weeks after" > "A month after" because the source says it was a month
Composition and lyrics[edit]
- "album,[10][9] with" - put the refs in order
- "and an organ heard" - remove the organ wikilink
Release[edit]
- Looks good
Reception[edit]
- Ref 26 is a page for reviews of Magic & Medicine, not of Nightfreak; here is the right link
- "process. wrote" > "process. He wrote"
- "or 'Pass It On'"," - replace the area in bold with Template:'"
- "The staff at Tiny Mix Tapes"> "A guest writer of Tiny Mix Tapes"
Track listing[edit]
- Good
Personnel[edit]
- Move the sentence to the beginning of the section
Charts[edit]
- Looks good
References[edit]
- Copyright violation score initally seems bad at 30% but it is mostly because of the album's title and songs so it should be ok
- Italicize the second "The Coral" on the title of refs 2 and 3
- Italicize the title of the album on ref 15
- Ref 17: "=BBC Music" > "BBC Music"
- Add
|author=Guest writer
on ref 30
External links[edit]
- Looks good
Overall[edit]
Good Article review progress box
|
You may oppose to any of the suggestions given here if you give a proper explanation. Wetrorave (talk) 15:09, 7 July 2021 (UTC)