Talk:Nissan Tiida/Archive 1

Archive 1

Merge Request

Most of the Versa info has moved here. Would it merge with Nissan Versa? -- Bull-Doser 14:48, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

• AMAZINGLY STRONGLY disagree Nissan Versa & Nissan Tiida should not be merged. There is one major difference between the two cars: The Versa is a hatchback, while the Tiida is a sedan. Also, the Tiida is sold as the Versa in the US, but as its sold as the Tiida everywhere else, both articles should be maintained seperatly, and link to each other.Hondasaregood¡Hable conmigo! 22:53, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
• Agree - They both deal with the exactly same car. Many other cars have different nameplates and still are the same car, so they are kept together. Both the Tiida and Versa are sold with both body styles (check the Australian and Canadian websites). , so Hondasaregood's hatchback vs. sedan argument is not vaild-- NaBUru38 03:41, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
• Agree to merge -- same cars renamed for different markets. Versa is a sedan or hatchback at NissanUSA.com.[1] Tiida can be either bodystyle everywhere else. But give it a week or two to secure consensus. --DeLarge 13:07, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
• Agree to merge - the Nissan Versa is just a rebadging exercise for the American market, the car is identical to the Tiida in every way. --Pc13 18:04, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

UK sales

When do UK sales of the Nissan Versa begin?

Car class

WP:OR, anyone? It's listed as a compact car here (and on {{Modern North American Nissan vehicles}} it's listed as a subcompact car). Yet, as per the discussion a year ago at Talk:Nissan Versa, reliable sources like the EPA who classify cars call it mid-size.[2][3] --DeLarge 01:38, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

• Why do people keep changing the class back to Compact or Subcompact? They can't make up their mind of course because the EPA rates it as a Midsize car. I thought that Category in the template is supposed to state what the EPA Class is, not what random editors on here think it should be based on external dimensions. I'm reverting until someone clarifies authoritatively that Class and/or Category does not specifically relate to the US EPA rating. Charlie Richmond 14:56, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

The Tiida in Europe

The Tiida is already for sale in many European markets, although not in the largest markets. That information should be updated. -- NaBUru38 16:20, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Does anyone know where the European market Tiidas are built? I am aware they don't make them in NMUK. People have suggested they're all coming from Mexico, but I can't see there being any sense in having tooling over there to produce right-hand drive models when the only RHD market outside of East Asia and Oceania is Ireland (AFAIK Australian models are made in Indonesia). So, any ideas? --Zilog Jones (talk) 21:16, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Chrysler Versa

Could we mention the Chrysler version of the Versa who'll be on sale in South America according to this article from AutoblogGreen? --Sd-100 (talk) 12:20, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

I spotted some new infos from the Sao Paulo auto show about the Chrysler version who'll be called the Dodge Trazo http://argentinaautoblog.blogspot.com/2008/10/saln-de-san-pablo-el-stand-de-chrysler.html

http://www.thescoop-cg.com/2008/10/28/new-trazo-c18-by-dodge-debuts-at-sao-paulo-motor-show/ --Sd-100 (talk) 14:38, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Article Start

Sounds amazingly like an ad, and the first sentence or two was written in engrish. I'd change it, but every time I do it, someone comes along and reverses it saying I vandalized the page. 75.173.196.111 (talk) 20:06, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Unmerge?

If the US-spec Versa sedan is indeed based on the March/Micra, and the hatchback based on the Tiida, perhaps the Versa should once again get its own page? Autonerd (talk) 17:40, 30 July 2011 (UTC) Autonerd

I agree. Sbrianhicks (talk) 17:09, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Strongly Disagree since the cars are still pretty much the same and the article is small anyway.

Whether based on other models or not they are still rebadged versions of each other.

Thanks Jenova20 12:45, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Uh, what? Sbrianhicks (talk) 18:03, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

I mean that the only real difference is the body style, unmerging will just create two stub articles and so isn't the best option.

This article could be improved instead to be more descriptive.

Thanks Jenova20 09:47, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Split already. The latest Nissan Versas aren't even based on Nissan Tiida at all. It has no place in a Nissan Tiida article. Leave Nissan Tiida contents for models where it is actually sold as a Tiida. - 142.150.48.202 (talk) 02:38, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

2013 Update

Anyone can update this? Especially as the Tiida is now sold in Australia as a Pulsar — Preceding unsigned comment added by Makewa (talk • contribs) 12:23, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Russia / Main article: Nissan Pulsar (C13)

I don't get it: is the so called "Nissan pulsar (C13)" only sold in the Russian market? Why is it put under the section of "Second generation (C12; 2011–present)"??? It IS confusing!!! Can other editors help here??? ---Now wiki (talk) 15:17, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

The article mentions that the Nissan Pulsar C13 model is sold in Europe (as Nissan Pulsar) and Russia (as Nissan Tiida). As you put it, you are right, the paragraph in this article about the C13 model should be moved to a new "Other versions" section, because it is not related to the C12 model. This would be in consistency with the Nissan Pulsar article, which does the same with the models sold in Australia. BaboneCar (talk) 20:09, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks.---Now wiki (talk) 20:13, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Not sold anymore in Japan

At Ryukyu Nissan I was recently told, that the Tiida is not sold anymore in Japan, due to lack of interest... most potential Tiida-buyers apparently decide for either the smaller and more fuel efficient Note or go for a larger vehicle. --126.125.178.30 (talk) 07:52, 31 July 2016 (UTC)