Talk:No. 1 Flying Training School RAAF/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Thurgate (talk) 00:20, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- prose:
(MoS):
- prose:
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Comments
[edit]1. basic instruction taking. Suggest - with basic instruction taking
- Done.
2. who served until 1929. Suggest - who commanded the unit until 1929.
- Already two variations on "command" in the sentence, made it "led".
3. became the nucleus. Suggest - formed the nucleus.
- Done.
4. varying. Suggest - varied.
- Done.
I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow you to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns. Thurgate (talk) 00:20, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks very much for reviewing. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 08:41, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- Nice work Ian. Passed. Thurgate (talk) 13:49, 4 March 2011 (UTC)