Talk:No. 47 Squadron RAF

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the No. 47 Squadron RAF article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Aviation / British / European / World War I / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War I task force
	World War II task force

Aviation

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

Plagiarism or permitted copying?

Much of this article seems to be a straight lift (copy and paste)from the RAF page quoted as a reference, is this OK or would a summary and a link to the RAF page be better? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ppeetteerr (talk • contribs) 09:55, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As the RAF Page isn't public domain, a copy (whether acknowledged or not), which is what much of the article is (i.e the paragraphs 2nd formation and 3rd formation) is not acceptable.Nigel Ish (talk) 10:07, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]