Talk:No. 6 Repair Depot RCAF

Military history: Aviation / Canadian / North America

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Canadian military history task force
	North American military history task force

Online sources[edit]

I cannot find very many online sources for some odd reason. Has anyone else found a site with the info on the 6RD/AMDU? 216.99.52.60 (talk) 01:02, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Response for online sources: The Government of Canada RCAF websites have been significantly reduced in continuing to carry the history of it's presently standing units. No. 6 RD transitioned to AMDU, which in turn transitioned to ATESS (Aerospace Telecommunications and Engineering Support Squadron). The present ATESS website below gives no historical details, and very brief present day details.

http://www.rcaf-arc.forces.gc.ca/en/8-wing/aerospace-telecommunications-engineering-support.page

SquashEngineer (talk) 18:10, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

New topics[edit]

Should this No. 6 RD wiki page be the collective holder for all the subsequent RCAF units that followed under that name? Specifically, No.6 RD became AMDU which in turn became ATESS. As there are presently no Wiki pages dedicated to those topics, it seems reasonable to collectively compile all history up to the present within this No. 6 RD topic, with appropriate redirects from the key words "AMDU" and "ATESS." This approach would permit updates for the functions being performed in Trenton at present, as well as the chronological summary of the units history. Ideally this would include the progression of the units list of commanding officers for completeness.

SquashEngineer (talk) 18:18, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's sounds reasonable. Go for it.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 00:17, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]