Talk:No. 82 Squadron RAAF/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 03:12, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	probably worth wl Lae Nadzab Airport, Tadji, Papua New Guinea and Kai Islands worth mentioning that Kuching is in Sarawak Good calls -- done. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 04:35, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	the url for the second Eather book isn't to a preview page, so suggest you use the pdf link instead, same for Stephens At the APDC, the PDF links open to save the file to your PC, rather than open in a new tab, etc, so I haven't found a way to link directly to the book as we can with say the official histories at the AWM (perhaps I'm missing something). Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 04:35, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply] Good point. Forget that. Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 04:41, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	All images are PD from the AWM
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.	~~Placing on hold for seven days for comments to be addressed~~ Passing, not much to do on this one. Well done. Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 04:41, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply] Tks PM! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 04:56, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]