They can be included if it's not mentioned in the body of the article. I removed the source for the producer since I later added it into the prose, but the label and recording studio isn't mentioned in the prose, so I wanted to make sure both statements are well-sourced.
Lead
"The song was written by its band members" → Here "its" is substituting "the song" and not "Maná".
"its lyrics deals" -> "its lyric deal". As a plural subject, it needs the plural form.
"A music video for it was..." → "A music video was". Simpler
Done
Background and composition
I know the source says this, but it's not "Cesar "Vampiro" Gonzalez", he is César López (Mexican musician).[1] Also, it's not Ivan Gonzalez but Iván González. As an English-language source, they tend to omit accents ("Is Mana for real", "Donde Jugaran los Nin~os?").
"[1][8][3]" → [1][3][8]
Done
Promotion and reception
"A live version of the track was recorded for their albums" → Two errors. The first is that "a" live version implies that only one live version of the song exists and it was included in two different albums. The second error, "their". Above, you were referring to the band in a singular form, so stick to one way.
Found this link qualifying the song and it's not present, which leads me to ask, is the reception complete?
Fixed the the first comment. For the second part, I felt that performance was suited for the 2019 version since that's what would later lead to the duet to avoid redundancy.
2019 version
with Maná's "rock melodies → misses a "
"the Latin Recording Academy Person of the Year gala in 2018 where" -> "2018, where".
"the 2019 version initially peaked at number 31". → "Initially" is a word that implies a contrast: "the 2019 version initially peaked at number 31, but later Billboard adjusted the methodology for the Latin Pop Airplay chart [...] and as a consequence, it was determined that actually had peaked at 23", for example. But this doesn't seem to be the case, and the February peak seems to be unrelated to the August one. "Debuted" or similar words go straight to the point.
I changed to "initial run" instead of "initially peaked", how does it look? The February link is to show how many weeks it spent and its highest peak before it re-entered the chart. I added the week of its new peak where it shows it became its 11th week on the chart after re-charting.
In the paragraph that starts with "No Ha Parado de Llover" the word "peaked" is used thrice.
Replaced second instance with reached.
"The first is a woman who loses her partner in a car crash [...] who was lead by a butterfly, representing her lover's spirit". → The source says "The clip tells the story of a woman who lost her best friend in a crash [...] which symbolizes the spirit of the friend who passed away in the accident." I watched the video and I can't see how they are considered lovers.
Yeah, that was my fault. I fixed it and apologize for it.
I had the wrong url, fixed it with the correct one. Thanks for catching that!
References
All the "-" (i.e. "Cuando Los Ángeles Lloran - Maná") have to be replaced with "–" (MOS:DASH).
Done
@Tbhotch:, I think I've covered just about everything. Thanks as always for reviewing one of my articles! Erick (talk) 22:42, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see any other major problem. I fixed a few things that slipped away. I'm therefore passing the nomination. Good job. (CC)Tbhotch™ 19:01, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
