Talk:Norsemen (TV series)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The official website link is for a different, unrelated, TV show, "vikings". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.84.204.63 (talk) 21:31, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is fixed now. Vejlenser (talk) 02:58, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion of description of the show's premise[edit]

Really? A short explanation of the basic premise of the show is classified as a "Excessive detail that doesn't improve the article"? What sense does that make? --U'et (talk) 00:18, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello U'et, I reverted your edit because I deemed the addition to be unnecessary, besides constituting original research. Tell me why you disagree. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 07:26, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I would think that should be obvious. If you're writing a summary of a TV series, shouldn't a short explanation of the basic premise of said series be a part of it? --U'et (talk) 11:47, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I can see your perspective, but it can't be obvious, otherwise I wouldn't be disputing it, right? There is already a short explanation of the show's premise. You are attempting to add detail to it. My position is that the detail is unnecessary, and additionally, it constitutes original research. I'm happy to continue this conversation with you in the hopes of reaching a mutually satisfactory conclusion, but I do ask that you remain humble in the way you communicate. Comments like "it should be obvious" are nonconstructive, and rather off-putting. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 16:35, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]