Talk:Norsk Spisevognselskap/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 20:32, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Disambiguations: none found
Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:33, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
Checking against GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- Instead, it partly constructed a tourist hotel in the station building at Oppdal Station... needs a mention of the partner in this development, as otherwise the sentence is inconclusive.
Not done
- I don't think I get what you mean, the operation was carried out by NSS through the Ministry of Transport and Communications. --Eisfbnore talk 14:33, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
As of 2011, the state railways handles the catering service on trains by procurement. Do you mean tendered contracts?Done
- The lead doesn't summarise the last section fully.
Not done
- I made a number of copy-edits.[1]
- Instead, it partly constructed a tourist hotel in the station building at Oppdal Station... needs a mention of the partner in this development, as otherwise the sentence is inconclusive.
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- Referencing is good, sources appear RS, no evidence of OR. Assume good faith for off-line sources and those on-line in Norwegian.
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- What happened to ReitanNarvesen? Who did it sell the rights to?
As noted on the talk page, a little more about the company executives would be good, if it can be found.Not done
- What happened to ReitanNarvesen? Who did it sell the rights to?
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- On hold for seven days for above issues to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:56, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
-
Gimme ten minutes, please? --Eisfbnore talk 18:51, 17 April 2011 (UTC)- Oh, sorry, I'm in another time zone so I actually have two hours left to go! --Eisfbnore talk 18:52, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
- Ok hold extended until 20 April, will that do? Jezhotwells (talk) 21:07, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
- There still remain un-addressed points, so I shall not be listing this article. Please work on these points and then re-nominate. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:10, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
- I hope I have solved all these isssues by now. --Eisfbnore talk 10:38, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
- There still remain un-addressed points, so I shall not be listing this article. Please work on these points and then re-nominate. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:10, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
- Ok hold extended until 20 April, will that do? Jezhotwells (talk) 21:07, 17 April 2011 (UTC)