Talk:North American SuperCorridor Coalition/Archive 1

Union truckers?

I just heard about this on a radio show today. Does anyone know anything about this? They're talking about a huge freeway directly into America so they can build ports down in mexico and import US goods without using union truckers? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.113.12.80 (talk • contribs) 16:55, 15 June 2006

POV

seems pov to me —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.24.236.49 (talk • contribs) 00:59, 16 January 2007

This is very POV. Except for the word "Supposedly", which was added by some random internet user and doesn't really mesh well with the rest of the intro, this article seems geared to paint Nasco in a glowing light. Someone from the organization probably wrote this article; I think it needs some edits. 64.24.236.106 06:39, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

The majority of the content on this page is from NASCO's website. I am the one who started the article and I don't work for NASCO.

If you have some criticisms I suggest trying to add them to the Criticisms section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rekutyn (talk • contribs) 16:03, 10 February 2007

Mistakes

page filled with misspellings ("marajuana") and one sided, randomly placed sentences in bold type that do not mesh witht he rest of the article —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.146.131.254 (talk • contribs) 13:57, 5 May 2007

Fair use rationale for Image:NASCO logo.jpg

Image:NASCO logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:01, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Ron Paul

Is this what Ron Paul was talking about? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.210.241.6 (talk) 05:34, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Yes Rekutyn (talk) 19:10, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

NASCO logo

I have gone ahead and re-added the NASCO logo to this page and tried to do my best to mark it as fair use of a logo. If anyone could assist to tag the image with the kinds of things it will need to survive being deleted (again), please do so. Rekutyn (talk) 22:39, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Disbanded, then Re-Started

NASCO was apparently disbanded a few months ago, by the looks of their website. Well, now they're back on with an improved web presence and content. Hopefully we can start documenting and adding this new material to Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nolte (talk • contribs) 04:53, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Ah, maybe I was thinking of the Security and Prosperity Partnership. In either case, the site is new and improved and has a lot more content than it did before.

Best, Nolte (talk) 04:56, 18 July 2010 (UTC)