Jump to content

Talk:Nottingham North (UK Parliament constituency)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Candadates.

[edit]

He's standing!--86.29.142.96 (talk) 10:11, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Candidates for the General Election 2010: Nottingham North
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
BNP Simon Brindley

He's a dope!--86.29.142.96 (talk) 10:13, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The word is "Candidates", and get a source. The election has not been called and unlike local elections it costs money to stand in the general, once the deposit is down then the candidates can be added. Darrenhusted (talk) 11:59, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2010 results

[edit]

The reference used for the table, http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/nottinghamnorth, differ quite a bit from the figures used on the BBC website = http://news.bbc.co.uk/nol/shared/election2010/results/constituency/d40.stm. I'm going to change it to those as many other constituency pages on wikipedia use this as a reliable source. KlickingKarl (talk) 15:10, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nottingham North (UK Parliament constituency). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:03, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]