Talk:Nuclear Strike (Spooks)/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ruby2010 talk 04:13, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

I will review sometime later today or tomorrow. Ruby2010 talk 04:13, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The character did not say a word throughout the entirety of the episode, yet has such a strong presence, which the producers felt was unique for a guest star in the series. I think the sentence has some tense issues. Did you mean he had such a strong presence? And make it more clear that it was the producers who felt he had the strong presence.
When Sam Miller called Cross about the development, the writer included as a last minute addition to the script, and the sequence was shot the next day. I think there's a word missing.
There are two disambiguation links that need to be fixed.

I made a few minor corrections myself, and everything else looks great. Just address the concerns above, and it will be good to go. Thanks, Ruby2010 talk 16:28, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. -- Matthew RD 21:39, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. Pass for GA. Nice work, Ruby2010 talk 22:27, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]