Talk:Nuclear reaction/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Merger - Nuclear reaction & Nuclear energy

Nuclear energy is basically a stub article and doesn't appear to mention anything that the nuclear reaction article does not. Would you guys prefer to simply harvest the aforementioned article and create a redirect, or move nuclear reaction? The former seems the better option, in my opinion. thadius856_{talk|airports|neutrality} 04:02, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

No problem here -- but it should be a dab page, not a redirect (as it already has several dab links). -- Securiger 11:13, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

I would prefer a dab page as well, because when people look for "nuclear energy" they're most often looking for "nuclear power". Simesa 22:04, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Agreed, dab is best. Do we want to carry this out? StevenBao^(talk) 20:24, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

I also agree. Do it. --Trjonescp 18:23, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Yes, do it. Fairymeimei 07:38, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

I agree, to the harvest, and like the "Dab" page idea, too. --'•Tbon e 55•^{(Talk) (Contribs) (UBX) (autographbook)} 23:25, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

I agree to the "Dab " idea Minidude09 20:44, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Yes, make Nuclear energy a dab page. -MrFizyx 22:34, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

I also agrea,make a dab page, it works better. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.241.1.75 (talk) 16:50, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Inclusion of the nuclear Nuclear technology nav

I think that this, or it's final merger should be included in the nuclear Nuclear technology nav pane.

--'•Tbon e 55•^{(Talk) (Contribs) (UBX) (autographbook)} 23:27, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

i think this whole nuclear stuff is confussing so if some one can edit in detail and good please do so!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.170.63.176 (talk) 03:20, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Question

In the section about "boiling" off of neutrons from an energetic nucleus, it is stated that protons don't participate leave because of the Coloumb barrier. I do not understand this, as the electrostatic forces would tend to push a proton away from rest of the nucleus. Can someone explain?Savoy rattler (talk) 07:52, 15 October 2011 (UTC)