Talk:O'Connor v. Donaldson

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

U.S. Supreme Court cases

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Disability

O'Connor v. Donaldson is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles

Dubious[edit]

The article makes claims that there was only an ONGYN on duty and that the only nurse was in the infirmary. Furthermore, no psychiatrist. These are big claims that really change the nature of his hospital stay. I don't see these claims supported in the citations. 73.38.177.57 (talk) 14:00, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled[edit]

can this article be expanded especially to give more information as to what his needs were and why he was confined? Tydoni (talk) 04:39, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense[edit]

This does not make sense:

" The origins of Donaldson's institutionalization began in 1943, at age 43, when he suffered a trauma episode. He was hospitalized and received treatment, before resuming life with his family. However, in 1950s he developed paranoid delusions, and was committed to the state hospital of Chattahoochee, Florida in 1956. He spent 15 years as a patient; though he did not receive any treatment, actively refusing it, and attempting to secure his release. Throughout his stay he denied he was ever ill, and refused to be put into a half-way house.

In 1956, Kenneth Donaldson, a 48-year-old man from Philadelphia... "

How could he be 43 in 1943 and 48 in 1956?

78.146.211.242 (talk) 18:52, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The use in this page of "petitioner" and "respondent" could be confusing to the layman interested in law. I would suggest rewriting the summary of how the petition was filed and how it moved through the courts. Medlinep (talk) 02:57, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mention the book Psychiatric Slavery by Thomas Szasz?[edit]

Psychiatrist Thomas Szasz wrote a whole book on this court case entitled Psychiatric Slavery. Perhaps it might be good to mention this book here in this article? Michael Ten (talk) 03:35, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]