Talk:OMG (NewJeans song)

OMG (NewJeans song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: February 26, 2024. (Reviewed version).

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Didn’t ‘OMG’ technically hit number one on circle chart?[edit]

If you think about it ‘OMG’ is at number two but it’s only being blocked by another one of Newjeans songs ‘Ditto’ that has stayed at the top for almost ten weeks. Technically it did hit number one on the digital circle chart. Jjjjfghh (talk) 21:34, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

Passed. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 04:03, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:OMG (NewJeans song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Nkon21 (talk · contribs) 20:46, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I will be reviewing this GAN! I broke the replay button for this song the entirety of last year...

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Comments[edit]

is a song by the South Korean idol girl group Not sure if "the" or "idol" is needed to be honest, as 99% of other K-pop articles don't use them

I took advice from WP:FALSETITLE. Of course not all articles should use them, but I believe it's proper English. Ippantekina (talk) 02:40, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

from their single album of the same name → from their single album of the same name (2023)

Done

pointing out that they're filming a music video → pointing out that they are filming a music video, per MOS:CONTRACTIONS

Done

"OMG" has lyrics in Korean and English → "OMG" contains lyrics in Korean and English

Done

Change the website parameter to publisher on ref 7

Done

Change the author in ref 9 to Rhian Daly

Done

Wrap the apostrophe in Pitchfork's in the "Music and lyrics" section with {{ }}
Replace the website on ref 36 with "Fan N Star"

Done

Replace the publisher on ref 37 with website

Done

Ref for "January 26, 2023" under music program awards is missing

Not done The Soompi ref needs to be replaced per WP:KO/RS#UR

Removed due to lack of reliable sources available. Ippantekina (talk) 03:02, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Add via=Naver to ref 2

Done

Ref 26 redirects back to the Circle Chart homepage; add trans-title and rename "publisher" as Circle Chart

Done

Write out RIAS as Recording Industry Association Singapore on ref 29

Done

Same thing for ref 50

Done

Add trans-title and author to ref 39
Add author to ref 42
Billboard Global 200 – Year-End 2023 → Billboard Global 200 – 2023 on ref 58

Done

Billboard Japan Hot 100 – 2023 Year-End → Billboard Japan Hot 100 – 2023 on ref 59

Done

Digital Chart 2023 → Digital Chart – 2023 on ref 60

Done

All refs should have consistent formatting, so add or substitute publisher=Naver to via=Naver to all refs where it applies (or vice versa)
I would suggest adding a promotion and live performances section, as many of them are already listed at List of NewJeans live performances
All sources should be archived too

My IArchivebot has been plagued with errors for some time now. Could you assist me with this? Ippantekina (talk) 04:20, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done with the help of another user. Ippantekina (talk) 03:59, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is overall a very well-written article so I don't have many comments regarding the prose, just some formatting tweaks and several others. Great work! ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 22:25, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All should be done now. Thanks for the review :) Ippantekina (talk) 05:56, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Passing now since all my concerns have been addressed. Good job! ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 04:03, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.