Talk:ONERA

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the ONERA article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Organizations Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

France Mid‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spaceflight Mid‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aviation

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

Physics: Fluid Dynamics Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Fluid Dynamics Taskforce.

Requested move 26 May 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Number 5 7 18:56, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

National Board of Study and Aerospace Research → ONERA – Common name of the institute, as it is (by far) most referred to outside and inside France, cfm. WP:COMMONNAME. --Relisted. George Ho (talk) 19:05, 3 June 2015 (UTC) Crowsnest (talk) 20:00, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment the current title does not seem to be a correct translation. National Office for Aerospace Research and Studies would be better (or something along those lines). -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 03:50, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Change - We do not translate article titles unless the characters are not in english script!! Simple as that, so it should be ONERA or Office National d’Études et de Recherches Aérospatiales, which everybody knows and NOT a translation which nobody knows!!!!!!!!--Petebutt (talk) 10:18, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the use of an abbreviation and support the English name "French National Aerospace Research Centre" or "National Office for Aerospace Studies and Research". See also Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English). Heamo Wacko (talk) 20:40, 27 May 2015 (UTC).[reply]

E.g. NASA or FIFA is also known primarily (common name) by its abbreviation (in case of FIFA also an abbreviation of a French name), and the Wikipedia article is named accordingly. See also WP:ACRONYMTITLE.

Some Google searches: for ONERA gives 458.000 hits, and for "French national aerospace research centre" gives 92.800 hits.

And on Google Scholar: ONERA gives 85.900 hits and "French national aerospace research centre" gives 11 hits. -- Crowsnest (talk) 21:50, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

From Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English)

The title of an article should generally use the version of the name of the subject which is most common in the English language, as you would find it in reliable sources (for example other encyclopediae and reference works, scholarly journals and major news sources).

So change it is!--Petebutt (talk) 07:07, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Petebutt: No it isn't. There is no clear consensus for the move and it needs to run for the full seven days to allow other editors to comment. Philg88 ^♦talk 09:08, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support ONERA is recognizable, consistent, and precise. A(Ch) 06:38, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nominator's sound and accurate analysis. Cavarrone 08:04, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.