This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The article USS Clark (FFG-11) should be merged here. It's about the exact same ship - only serving in a different navy with a different name. Neither article is too long to prevent justifying a merge, on the contrary - both articles are quite short. Even most of the infobox is duplicated in both articles. JIP | Talk 19:27, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support@JIP: This is an uncontroversial merger IMO. Ships in similar situations almost always have a single page with redirect from the other name, and then a single history about the ship. One example of this would be USS Whippoorwill (AMS-207), which RSS Jupiter (M101) redirects to. I don't believe there's really a standard of which article gets merged into which—of course the article's main title should be the more notable of the two. I believe as she is still in service as the Pułaski it should be that, though the Clark has hundreds of pageviews/month while this page only has a few, so there may be some disagreement there. I'll be happy to start the merge myself sometime soonish. - - mathmitch7(talk/contribs) 12:29, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Please do, if you have intended to do it anyway. JIP | Talk 12:43, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
@JIP: I've executed the merge, if you are interested in taking a look at the now-merged page and want to make any edits. - - mathmitch7(talk/contribs) 19:37, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg)
