Talk:Obconic

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Notability or just a definition?[edit]

This article so far is mostly a definition. Is there going to be content added from reliable sources where this subject has been discussed as more than just a definition more appropriate to Wiktionary than Wikipedia? ChildofMidnight (talk) 06:12, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for your interest in this article. It is quite notable and an important topic in botany. More content and sources to come. You are rather quick on the trigger to tag a new article under construction. A fair minded person would have the courtesy to remove this tag. This article is already better sourced than 70 percent of wikipedia articles. Plumpurple (talk) 06:38, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The tags are used to note areas that need improvement. They can be removed at any time by any editor, usually after the concerns are addressed. You might consider using an {{underconstruction}} tag in future. Otherwise there's no way to tell if you've just started working on the article or you're finished. The other way to go is to work on it in your userspace until it's ready and then move it to article space. Looks good though, thanks for the interesting contribution. ChildofMidnight (talk) 08:01, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn't some line drawing samples be appropriate? fuzzface80 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.173.32.38 (talk) 12:32, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Obconic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090719220426/http://globaltwitcher.auderis.se:80/artspec_information.asp?thingid=84109&lang=us to http://globaltwitcher.auderis.se/artspec_information.asp?thingid=84109&lang=us

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:53, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]