Talk:Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Psychology

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

https://www.nytimes.com/1974/01/13/archives/obedience-to-authority-an-experimental-view.html

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0094306118779813a

Style?

I just think that the following excerpt is a bit off for an encyclopedia.

In 1963, Milgram published The Behavioral Study of Obedience[1] in the Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, which included a detailed experiment record and experiment of the controversial electric shock experiment. There were two stunning findings. The first was the extraordinary strength of the obedience and the second was the tension such experiment brought to participants.[1] Never the less, all participants reached an electric shock of 300 or more.

First of all, what does "a detailed experiment record and experiment" mean? I wonder if the writer mistakenly used a wrong word in there.

Is calling findings "stunning" a bit too value-laden?

"strength of the obedience" doesn't seem right. Maybe something like: "robust nature of obedience across all participants", or "marked adherence to commands", or "high level of acquiescence to the instructions of authorities", maybe even adding "despite being led to believe that [there was harm-- don't know how best to word this]".

"tension such experiment brought to participants" is also awkward. Maybe "tension" or "emotional turmoil/distress that the participants experienced"

I don't feel familiar enough with the work to make such changes, but I wanted to bring attention to them. Jkgree (talk) 17:13, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]