This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Warwickshire, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Warwickshire. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Please also feel free to join in the discussions on the project's talk page.WarwickshireWikipedia:WikiProject WarwickshireTemplate:WikiProject WarwickshireWikiProject Warwickshire articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Don't merge. There seems to be sufficient distinct material and no support for the proposal in 3 years since proposal; stale.
As much of the material in this stub article is repeated in the article for Offchurch it would appear to be more appropriate to merge the details of this manor house in the notable buildings section for the village itself rather than seperate as it is. Details from any sources Pevesner, English Heritage, Victoria County History are sparce and so a fuller description or history is unlikely to be achieved. This manor house does not seem to be of a size or with a detailed history sufficiant to warrant its own article as would be the case with say Baddesley Clinton, Coughton Courtor the like. Any thoughts on this from anyone. Argrogan (talk) 19:20, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I take your point about size etc, but as a Grade II* listed, this is quite an important article that could be worked on (although I haven't searched for refs). Widefox (talk) 07:43, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: This doesn't seem to have been dealt with properly, as not advertised on the other page. I also agree with the above Keep argument, and should be closed as stale.Klbrain (talk) 21:29, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.