Talk:Official (Canadian football)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canadian football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canadian football and the Canadian Football League on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Canadian footballWikipedia:WikiProject Canadian footballTemplate:WikiProject Canadian footballCanadian football articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Is the Back Umpire nomenclature defunct?[edit]

I've seen some mechanics manuals, particular for five- and six-official crews, that refer to the deep official as the Back Umpire (or Back Umpire and Back Judge, for six-official mechanics). In these situations, the Umpire is disambiguated as Line Umpire.

Is this terminology still in use, or is Back Judge now in use for five-official crews? —C.Fred (talk) 20:44, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Found the Football Canada rulebook and my answer. Back Umpire is still in use, but the other position is just Umpire. —C.Fred (talk) 02:52, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Official (Canadian football). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:31, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]