Talk:Olympic Australis
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
No longer the largest
[edit]According to [this], [this], [this], and so on, an even larger (much larger) stone has been found. Figured I'd drop this bit of info for anyone watching and/or editing this page. Lost on Belmont (talk) 22:06, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
Gee, a freaking picture would help
[edit]This is the problem with the draconian and somewhat anal limitations to posting Photos. Most of the editors on Wikpedia are anal anyway. I once paid $50 for publishing rights to a photo, and the nice mother's basement dwelling lad kept removing it because I could not provide "documentation". Another reason not to take Wik seriously.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.24.171.178 (talk • contribs) 03:54, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- Stub-Class South Australia articles
- Low-importance South Australia articles
- WikiProject South Australia articles
- WikiProject Australia articles
- Stub-Class Gemology and Jewelry articles
- Low-importance Gemology and Jewelry articles
- WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry - Gemstones
- WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry articles