Talk:Olympus Corporation/Archive 1
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Article
This article needs some explicit examples to back up words like "groundbreaking" and "revolutionary". Dyl 08:29, Jan 4, 2005 (UTC)
Not just optics
Olympus is not just an optics company. They may have started out as an optics company, but they are now known for other items such as digital voice recorders. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.146.16.251 (talk) 19:16, 14 February 2007 (UTC).
SSWF
The SSWF link in 'see also' is just a redirect back to this page. I'm kind of new at this so I'm not sure what to do. Should the redirect be removed, leaving a 'see also' link to a page that doesn't exist? Should the link be removed, leaving SSWF to redirect to a page which does not mention SSWF? Should they both be removed? Or will somebody write an SSWF article? Angelastic 11:16, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Olympus Logo.png
Image:Olympus Logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 16:03, 8 March 2008 (UTC)