Jump to content

Talk:One for the Money (disambiguation)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconDisambiguation
WikiProject iconThis disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.

Untitled[edit]

OK, I am an admin, guys what did you want me to move where? My head is spinning. Casliber (talk · contribs) 09:14, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm not sure just how this goes. But review the history of this article. It used to be a tv episode, then it was redirected and then made a disambig page. The content up to the redirect should be at One For the Money (The Golden Girls) (w/uppercase "For" as that was the title, I guess) and everything afterwards restored to this address. I think. Then the redirect needs to have {{ER to list entry|The Golden Girls}} appended to it. Where this talk page goes, I have no idea. There are most of 180 other Golden Girl episodes, all redirected, that should have the ER tag applied (and eps of other shows). Some of them will have similar issues as this page; to whom does this burden fall? Cheers, and thanks, Jack Merridew 09:27, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I can't see how to split a history as such. I figured the most relevant pages were the article at its largest and the redirect tag, so both are now at One For the Money (The Golden Girls), along with the template above. Casliber (talk · contribs) 09:37, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not what I had in mind. The non-notable article is still in the history here; the new redirect has no history. There must be something at WP:NAS; I'll go looking. Cheers, Jack Merridew 09:43, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
See Wikipedia:New admin school/Deleting#Restoring selected revisions. It has a sandbox-like place to test. Cheers, Jack Merridew 09:45, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think the basic idea is to move the thing and restore selected revisions. I've seen this done elsewhere, but don't recall where or who did it. The operative term is split history. Cheers, Jack Merridew 09:54, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]