Talk:Oneida stirpiculture

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[Untitled][edit]

The oneida community talk page has a question about bias, and I'm raising the same question here. Personally I am wondering why the current article *doesn't* at least offer a *view* of Noyes as a "sex-crazed manipulator" (not my term) ... this article and the community article are parroting Oneida's printed goals at face value, as if they were in fact achieved, without any alternate point of view of the disparity between human nature and the ideal. The statutory rape charge mentioned in the main article is the only indicator that this cult may have been an excuse for older men to get with 14 year old girls as "wives", like the small, private communities still existing in the USA. (One was infamously "raided" years ago and the minors put in protective custody - and returned to their families when no allegations would stick, lol.) I'm guessing that more than one of the many sources for the community article offers criticism - why is none of it included here? Ukrpickaxe (talk) 03:14, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

'Stirpiculture' is an independent term from Oneida[edit]

These two terms are not interrelated; Oneida the name that stemmed from the native group "Ganneious/Ganneous/Gannejout(s)"; the Mississaugas. ElizaultyShaelicGorangMaqCat (talk) 19:30, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]