This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Pirhayati Many thanks for this new article. I struggle a little with some aspects of it, though. The 1966 interview to the Spiegel published in 1976 is certainly mentioned in Martin Heideggers main article here, but the new fork does not seem to add valuable additional information. It merely duplicates the main text. I'm not sure a split is warranted. See also WP:CORRECTSPLIT for additional steps when splitting. Lastly, I'm not sure if the interview is "famous". It certainly is mentioned a few times; Heidegger did not give many interviews. However the German article (I like to reference "native" language articles) does not mention the title of the interview at all - it's just a line in the bibliography and references - and otherwise refers to it as "1966 Spiegel interview" or "an interview given in 1966". That article is classified as excellent by German Wiki standards. No separate article about this interview exists. This does raise some questions about notability in general over here as well I'd say. pseudonymJake Brockmantalk09:19, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]