Talk:Open Source Initiative

California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Top-importance).

Open (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Open, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OpenWikipedia:WikiProject OpenTemplate:WikiProject OpenOpen articles

Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Open Source Initiative article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

OpenSource logo[edit]

does anyone know when is the logo inargurated? Xah Lee 09:16, 2005 May 8 (UTC)

See my comments today related to making OSI external link more prominent at: [Talk:Open_source] that relate to this page. Fholson 13:02, 6 October 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fholson (talk • contribs)

Fair use rationale for Image:Opensource.svg[edit]

Image:Opensource.svg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 07:35, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Osi-certified.jpg[edit]

Image:Osi-certified.jpg will be deleted ~~in seven days~~ on the 26th if no one writes a real fair use rationale. -- Thinboy00 ^talk/_contribs @80, i.e. 00:55, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing links to this image. Speedy deletion is appropriate. And, given that it is a trademark, it's not clear that you can even say its name on Wikipedia, much less link to it, much less host the image, unless you want those nasty Open Source Initiative people to sue you. Wikipedia isn't allowed to use trademarks truthfully -- THAT WOULD BE ILLEGAL! RussNelson (talk) 07:09, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alumni?[edit]

What's an "OSI board alumni"? --Damiens.rf 19:24, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And how does including a list of past board members add value to this article, @ClareTheSharer:? Toddst1 (talk) 20:06, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The list demonstrates a great deal of notability in previous Directors (as well as highlighting how non-notable the current Board is), as well as giving a convenient matrix of links to information about them that is not available elsewhere. In addition to these facts, my personal policy is not to needlessly discard the work of others even if I doubt that it would be useful to create it if it did not already exist. What is your motivation for deleting this useful information that's been laboriously gathered? ClareTheSharer (talk) 21:26, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

cororate suspension question[edit]

Uh, I'm a noob. and please forgive my not doing edits quite the right way. I added one sentence about OSI's corporate suspension to the history section. The suspension is easily verified by visiting the CA secretary of state site: kepler.sos.ca.gov and typing in "open source initiative" as the search term. I couldn't find a "permalink" so what is the right way to cite that site? Thank you in advance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.236.81.17 (talk) 01:06, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This link is broken --76.226.68.97 (talk) 15:46, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Googling "open source initiative suspended" turns up lots - David Gerard (talk) 11:42, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The accounts that were found to have been mislaid were actually from some time prior; the current Board merely had the job of correcting an inherited problem by finding and submitting them. Webmink (talk) 21:09, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Creators "leaving" the org?[edit]

Full disclosure: ESR was banned from the mailing list for harassing me.

I'm not sure why creators leaving the org or being banned from the mailing list is here. It's not accurate as neither of them were really involved beforehand. It definitely shouldn't be 25% of the history section.

While I'm happy to provide additional context to assist other editors in improvement, I believe I personally have a conflict of interest, particularly as it relates to ESR being banned from the list, so I don't want to edit that part of the article. Hammy (talk) 02:28, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]