Talk:Operation Hannover

A fact from Operation Hannover appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 April 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the most successful of Nazi Germany's anti-partisan operations of the Second World War was Operation Hannover?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/April.

Wikipedia

Military history: European / German / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War II task force

Rating[edit]

I have completed the B class review of this article and believe that it is currently a Start class. I believe that it could be improved by addressing the following:

Coverage: the article currently seems to be a bit light on content. Could the operation be discussed in more detail, along with some analysis of the aftermath or how it effected the overall campaign?
Grammar: I think that there is a tense issue in the prose that could be fixed by a copy edit. For example in the Background section "...Soviet partisans have been...". As this article refers to something that occured in the past, perhaps it should say "...Soviet partisans had been..." There seem to be other examples as well, for example use of "is" when perhaps "was" would be better.

Just a couple of ideas. If you wish to have more in depth comments, you might like to submit the article to peer review. This can be done by adding it to the list at WP:MHPR. When you feel like you would like it to be re-assessed, this can be done by adding it to the list at WP:MHA. Hope this helps. AustralianRupert (talk) 23:50, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]